How improving time outs may prevent wrong-site surgery

Every week, there are anywhere between 40 and 60 wrong-site surgeries that are performed in Iowa and the rest of the U.S. The most frequent wrong-site surgeries are orthopedic, dental and spinal surgeries. Overall, the most common type of WSS is a laterality surgery, i.e. surgery on a right or left extremity or organ.

As for the factors in WSS, they can be several: inadequate training, unqualified staff, lack of a safety-minded culture, poor teamwork and communication breakdowns (especially during the scheduling phase). When there are no standardized practices for verifying patients in the preoperative area, problems can arise. Another issue can lie with the “time out” that is performed in preparation of the surgery.

Distractions, time constraints and the compartmentalizing of roles (the “silo mentality”) can all lead to an ineffective time out, setting the stage for a WSS. Medical centers should assess these risks and provide regular education to all staff. They should also involve the patient, verifying the procedure to be done and on what site or what side of the body.

When everyone is included in the time out, it can become easier for some to voice concerns. Leaders should then address those concerns immediately, encouraging a safety-minded culture. After observing the time out with some consistency, medical centers can identify areas of improvement.

Without these measures, however, hospitals and medical centers will only continue to raise the risk for errors. As for a WSS victim, they may have good grounds for a medical malpractice claim. Since filing a claim can be a complicated process, it may be wise to see a lawyer before doing anything. The lawyer could request an inquiry with the local medical board and hire third parties to conduct their own investigations.

Free Case Evaluation

Was Your Injury Caused by Medical Negligence?

Every case is different. Speak with our attorneys directly — it’s free and confidential.

FEATURED RESULT – NOVEMBER 2025

Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

$19.8M

Verdict against Mayo Clinic — among the largest medical malpractice verdicts in Iowa history

Related Posts

Medical Malpractice

Iowa clinic misdiagnoses cancer, removes prostate by mistake

Two years ago, an Iowa clinic mistakenly removed a man’s healthy prostate gland after misdiagnosing him with cancer. The case involving the 67-year-old Iowa native

Medical Malpractice

Study links frequent doctor burnout with malpractice

According to a study recently published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings, more than half of all doctors in Iowa and across the U.S. suffer from burnout.

Medical Malpractice

Opioids and anticoagulants cause many drug-related claims

In recent years, an aging senior population and the increased availability of healthcare options for younger people has resulted in a growing number of Iowa

Medical Malpractice

9-year-old dies hours after tonsillectomy

Our source article for today’s blog post tells a tragic story of a nine-year-old girl who died mere hours after a routine tonsillectomy. Given that

Medical Malpractice

Understanding Medical Malpractice: When Does a Mistake Become Negligence?

We place enormous trust in our doctors, nurses, and healthcare providers. When we enter a hospital or clinic, we believe we’re in capable hands—hands guided

Medical Malpractice

Migraines can be mistaken for other conditions

Individuals in Iowa and throughout the country may feel a variety of symptoms that are the result of a migraine headache. However, since migraines can

Disclaimer

No Legal Advice

The information on this website is for general informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. You should consult a qualified attorney regarding your specific situation.

No Attorney-Client Relationship

Contacting Hixson & Brown, P.C. by phone, email, or contact form does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship is only established through a signed engagement letter.

Confidential Information

Please do not send confidential or sensitive information until an attorney-client relationship has been formally established. Information sent prior may not be protected by attorney-client privilege.

No Guarantee of Results

Every case is different. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case.