MRI-guided robot may provide more accurate biopsies

Due to limited technology and the possibility of human error, biopsies for breast cancer are not always accurate. They are also known for being time consuming. This is a problem since the American Association of Preferred Provider Organizations claims that cancer surgeons perform more than 1.7 million breast biopsies every year throughout Iowa and the rest of the U.S.

However, researchers in the Netherlands are in the final stages of developing a medical robot, the smallest of its kind, that can retrieve biopsy samples in the MRI scanner itself. Named the Stormram 4, the robot is made from 3D-printed plastic and can handle a single thin biopsy needle with sub-millimeter precision control.

In the manual procedure, the surgeon must use a thick needle and insert it multiple times before it can extract a sufficient tissue sample. The Stormram 4, however, can hit the target coordinate on the first attempt. Since it can do so during the MRI itself, doctors can follow the needle in nearly real-time imaging. By shortening the procedure, it will allow MRI scanner facilities to make the most effective use of their time.

Still, the Stormram 4 will likely not receive regulatory approval until more trials are undergone. A similar robot is being developed by Worcester Polytechnic Institute that may change the way Parkinson’s disease and prostate cancer are treated.

Cancer misdiagnoses are still common in the medical field, and they constitute one form of medical malpractice. When an individual discovers late-stage cancer and realizes that their doctor failed to diagnose it, they may consult with a lawyer about filing a claim. If the patient dies, the family can file. A lawyer will most likely request a medical inquiry and determine if the doctor explicitly failed to comply with a set standard of care.

Free Case Evaluation

Was Your Injury Caused by Medical Negligence?

Every case is different. Speak with our attorneys directly — it’s free and confidential.

FEATURED RESULT – NOVEMBER 2025

Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

$19.8M

Verdict against Mayo Clinic — among the largest medical malpractice verdicts in Iowa history

Related Posts

Medical Malpractice

How improving time outs may prevent wrong-site surgery

Every week, there are anywhere between 40 and 60 wrong-site surgeries that are performed in Iowa and the rest of the U.S. The most frequent

Medical Malpractice

Patients being sued for leaving negative reviews

While Iowa patients expect their doctors to have their best interests in mind, there are some doctors who do not listen to their patients or

Medical Malpractice

Opioids and anticoagulants cause many drug-related claims

In recent years, an aging senior population and the increased availability of healthcare options for younger people has resulted in a growing number of Iowa

Medical Malpractice

9-year-old dies hours after tonsillectomy

Our source article for today’s blog post tells a tragic story of a nine-year-old girl who died mere hours after a routine tonsillectomy. Given that

Medical Malpractice

Understanding Medical Malpractice: When Does a Mistake Become Negligence?

We place enormous trust in our doctors, nurses, and healthcare providers. When we enter a hospital or clinic, we believe we’re in capable hands—hands guided

Medical Malpractice

Iowa clinic misdiagnoses cancer, removes prostate by mistake

Two years ago, an Iowa clinic mistakenly removed a man’s healthy prostate gland after misdiagnosing him with cancer. The case involving the 67-year-old Iowa native

Disclaimer

No Legal Advice

The information on this website is for general informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. You should consult a qualified attorney regarding your specific situation.

No Attorney-Client Relationship

Contacting Hixson & Brown, P.C. by phone, email, or contact form does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship is only established through a signed engagement letter.

Confidential Information

Please do not send confidential or sensitive information until an attorney-client relationship has been formally established. Information sent prior may not be protected by attorney-client privilege.

No Guarantee of Results

Every case is different. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case.