New sepsis guidelines may not be helpful

According to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, treatment should begin within an hour after symptoms of the condition are spotted. The 60-minute window begins after an individual arrives in triage. These guidelines were implemented in 2018, and they were designed to help identify and treat sepsis in emergency rooms faster. In the past, treatment could be given over a period of three or six hours. However, evidence suggests that such a condensed timeline could result in people being diagnosed with sepsis who don’t actually have it.

This is partially because the limited time to treat a patient could cause stress among those tasked with helping them. If a person doesn’t have sepsis, he or she could be harmed by the antibiotics used to combat it. While there are cases in which patients could be misdiagnosed, others argue that sepsis needs to be identified and treated quickly. Patients who were accurately diagnosed and treated for sepsis in a timely manner generally had positive outcomes.

The treatment guidelines call for a nurse or other medical professional to measure lactate levels. If they are elevated, the next step is to collect and analyze a blood sample. From there, antibiotics can be administered if necessary, and vasopressors may be applied if a patient is hypotensive.

If a medical error results in a worsened medical condition, an individual may be entitled to compensation for medical bills and other damages. This is generally the case if an error was made by someone who had the tools and experience needed to make an accurate diagnosis. An attorney may use medical records, statements made by a patient and other evidence to show that malpractice occurred. Victims might receive compensation through a settlement or by successfully proving their case to a jury.

Free Case Evaluation

Was Your Injury Caused by Medical Negligence?

Every case is different. Speak with our attorneys directly — it’s free and confidential.

FEATURED RESULT – NOVEMBER 2025

Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

$19.8M

Verdict against Mayo Clinic — among the largest medical malpractice verdicts in Iowa history

Related Posts

Medical Malpractice

Iowa clinic misdiagnoses cancer, removes prostate by mistake

Two years ago, an Iowa clinic mistakenly removed a man’s healthy prostate gland after misdiagnosing him with cancer. The case involving the 67-year-old Iowa native

Medical Malpractice

Study links frequent doctor burnout with malpractice

According to a study recently published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings, more than half of all doctors in Iowa and across the U.S. suffer from burnout.

Medical Malpractice

Opioids and anticoagulants cause many drug-related claims

In recent years, an aging senior population and the increased availability of healthcare options for younger people has resulted in a growing number of Iowa

Medical Malpractice

9-year-old dies hours after tonsillectomy

Our source article for today’s blog post tells a tragic story of a nine-year-old girl who died mere hours after a routine tonsillectomy. Given that

Medical Malpractice

Understanding Medical Malpractice: When Does a Mistake Become Negligence?

We place enormous trust in our doctors, nurses, and healthcare providers. When we enter a hospital or clinic, we believe we’re in capable hands—hands guided

Medical Malpractice

Migraines can be mistaken for other conditions

Individuals in Iowa and throughout the country may feel a variety of symptoms that are the result of a migraine headache. However, since migraines can

Disclaimer

No Legal Advice

The information on this website is for general informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. You should consult a qualified attorney regarding your specific situation.

No Attorney-Client Relationship

Contacting Hixson & Brown, P.C. by phone, email, or contact form does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship is only established through a signed engagement letter.

Confidential Information

Please do not send confidential or sensitive information until an attorney-client relationship has been formally established. Information sent prior may not be protected by attorney-client privilege.

No Guarantee of Results

Every case is different. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case.